We are not just material beings, but spiritual persons with a need for meaning, purpose, and fulfillment that transcends the visible confines of this world. This longing for transcendence is a longing for truth, goodness, and beauty. Truth, goodness, and beauty are called the transcendentals of being, because they are aspects of being. Everything in existence has these transcendentals to some extent. God, of course, as the source of all truth, goodness, and beauty, has these transcendentals to an infinite degree. Oftentimes, he draws us to himself primarily through one of these transcendentals. St. Augustine, who was drawn to beauty in all its creaturely forms, found the ultimate beauty he was seeking in God, his creator, the beauty “ever ancient, ever new.”―Sister Gabriella Yi, O.P.

Friday, September 23, 2016

Best buds: Archbishop Durocher & FutureChurch

Woe to you, when all men speak well of you,
for so their fathers did to the false prophets.—St. Luke 6:26

FutureChurch, an association of heretics, has spoken well of Archbishop Paul-André Durocher.

LifeSiteNews has an article on deaconette fanboy Archbishop Paul-André Durocher.
GATINEAU, Quebec, September 23, 2016 (LifeSiteNews) — A Canadian archbishop is defending an award he received Thursday night from a dissident U.S. Catholic group for his work in promoting female deacons within the Catholic Church during the 2015 Family Synod in Rome.
“I believe in building bridges. I believe in dialogue. I might not agree with everything [FutureChurch] espouse[s], and you might not agree with everything I do, yet it is important that in the Church we never stop reaching out to each other and working together for the greater good whenever we can,” Archbishop Paul-André Durocher of the Gatineau diocese in Quebec said during his acceptance speech.
There is reaching out to build bridges with people of goodwill, and then there is the foolishness of going to bed with the enemy.
Does Archbishop Durocher support the ordination of women to the same diaconate as men? By all reasonable accounts, yes, he does. If there is doubt about the accuracy of that conclusion—e.g., perhaps Durocher was referring to deaconesses who were not ordained like men, merely commissioned to a ministry, as we might say nowadays—then Durocher might be permitted some latitude. However, the organization that has awarded him their approval is a group that has made clear that it wants nothing less than the ordination of women to the priesthood, something which Saint John Paul II stated is absolutely impossible. Roma locuta est, causa finita est.

Should Archbishop Durocher be more concerned about the delicate souls of those in the Church for whom his comments and behaviour is a cause for confusion?

Archbishop Durocher should not be so cavalier as to justify his acceptance of the award by stating
"I might not agree with everything [FutureChurch] espouse[s], and you might not agree with everything I do, yet it is important that in the Church we never stop reaching out to each other and working together for the greater good whenever we can(.)"
Is Durocher saying he would accept an award from Planned Parenthood if he and they happen to agree on the important matter of women's health? Note to Archbishop Durocher: Planned Parenthood and the Catholic Church have very different views on women's health.

The scandal of appearances.

Archbishop Durocher is not merely dialoguing with FutureChurch. He has accepted an award from them. He has not merely "built a bridge". Durocher has accepted a portion of the toll that FutureChurch exacts from the (low-information) faithful who are, given Durocher's cozy association with dissidents, now more likely to cross over that bridge into dissent.

Archbishop Durocher, whether he realizes it or not, has rented a motel room with FutureChurch and slept in the same (deaconess') bed. He may not have taken off his clothes, but he certainly shares with them at least one theological disease.

No comments:

Post a Comment

"A multitude of wise men is the salvation of the world(.)—Wisdom 6:24. Readers are welcome to make rational and responsible comments. Any comment that 1) offends human dignity and/or 2) which constitutes an irrational attack on the Catholic Faith will not go unchallenged. If deemed completely stupid, such a comment will most assuredly not see the light of day. Them's the rules. Don't like 'em? Move on.